BI-VitalLife Cohort study

Introduction

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), a chronic metabolic disorder, significantly increases cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. Integrative care (IC) offers a personalized health management approach, utilizing various interventions to mitigate this risk. However, the impact of IC on CVD risk in newly diagnosed T2Dm patients remains unclear. This study aims to assess the differences in CVD risk development within 120 months following a new diagnosis of T2DM, using real-world data from Bumrungrad International Hospital and Vitallife Scientific Wellness Center.
 

Methods

This study utilized the BI-VitalLife Cohort dataset that contains de-identified demographics, vitals, diagnoses and clinical information, laboratory and radiological data, medications, and treatments of more than 2.8 million patients who visited Bumrungrad International Hospital and/or VitalLife Scientific Wellness Center from June 1, 1999, to May 31, 2022. This study focused on newly diagnosed T2DM patients, defined according to American Diabetes Association criteria. We compared CVD risk between the IC and conventional care (CC) groups using the Kaplan-Meier curve and Cox proportional hazard model, adjusted for age, sex, and laboratory values. Propensity score matching was employed to enhance comparability
 

Results

Of the 5,687 patients included, 236 were in the IC group and 5,451 in the CC group. The IC group, characterized by a lower age at T2DM diagnosis, showed favorable hematological and metabolic profiles. The Cox proportional hazard ratios revealed a significantly lower CVD risk in the IC group within 120 months post-T2DM diagnosis compared to the CC group, consistent even after adjusting for confounding factors. Propensity score-matched analysis supported these findings.
 

Conclusion

Personalized integrative care may offer a significant advantage in reducing CVD risk among newly diagnosed T2DM patients compared to conventional care, even when considering various confounding factors. This study sheds light on the potential of integrative care in informing treatment strategies for T2DM patients at risk of developing CVD.
 

Figures
 

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Prof. Dr. Nimit Taechakraichana, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Suwatchai Pornratanarangsi, and Dr. Palita Lungchukiet for their valuable guidance and support throughout the process.
 

References

1. Abdul-Ghani M, DeFronzo RA, Del Prato S, Chilton R, Singh R, Ryder REJ. Cardiovascular Disease and Type 2 Diabetes: Has the Dawn of a New Era Arrived? Diabetes Care. 2017;40(7):813–20. pmid:28637886.
2. Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, Go AS, Arnett DK, Blaha MJ, Cushman M, et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2016 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2016;133(4):e38–360. Epub 20151216. pmid:26673558.
3. Tuso P. Prediabetes and lifestyle modification: time to prevent a preventable disease. Perm J. 2014;18(3):88–93. pmid:25102521.
4. Li S, Wang J, Zhang B, Li X, Liu Y. Diabetes Mellitus and Cause-Specific Mortality: A Population-Based Study. Diabetes Metab J. 2019;43(3):319–41. pmid:31210036.